Puma Chenille Patch Backpack vs Puma Final Pro Backpack
The main difference between the Puma Chenille Patch Backpack and the Puma Final Pro Backpack is that the Chenille Patch Backpack has Internal Compartments (Laptop sleeve) while the Final Pro Backpack does not.
|
|
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Specs | Brand | Puma | Puma |
| Name | Chenille Patch Backpack | Final Pro Backpack | |
| Category | Everyday | Everyday | |
| Sub Category | Daypack | Daypack | |
| Dimensions (in) | 20.1 x 13.8 x 1 | ||
| Weight (lb) | 1.1 | ||
| Color | Dark Grey | Puma Black-fiery Coral | |
| Rating | 4.7 | 3.3 | |
| Price | Under $100 | Under $50 | |
| General Features | Shoulder Straps | Padded, adjustable straps | J shape - adjustable padded strap |
| Zippers | Nylon zipper with metal pulls | Nylon zipper with webbing pulls | |
| Main Compartment Access | Normal top two way zip access | Normal top zip access | |
| External Pockets | 1 front zip pocket, 2 side slip-in pockets | 1 front zip pocket | |
| Internal Compartments | Laptop sleeve | ||
| Side Pockets | 2 side slip-in pockets | ||
| Water Bottle | Yes | ||
| Handles | Top grab handle | Top grab handle | |
| Business & School Features | Laptop Sleeve | Padded | |
| Hiking / Backpacking Features | Back Panel | Padded | Padded |
You're currently comparing the Chenille Patch Backpack by Puma against the Final Pro Backpack by Puma.
Puma's Chenille Patch Backpack is a Everyday backpack with Daypack features while Puma's Final Pro Backpack is a Everyday backpack with Daypack features.
The Puma Chenille Patch Backpack has a capacity of (liters), weighs 1.1 pounds and it's dimensions in inches are . It's made of and is available in Dark Grey in comparison the Puma Final Pro Backpack's capacity is with a size of 20.1 x 13.8 x 1 inches. Constructed from it weighs pounds and is available in Puma Black-fiery Coral.
Compare Puma Chenille Patch Backpack
Click image to compare, or description to view product.
Compare Puma Final Pro Backpack
Click image to compare, or description to view product.
