The North Face Griffin 75 Backpack vs The North Face Ruthsac Backpack
The main difference between the The North Face Griffin 75 Backpack and the The North Face Ruthsac Backpack is that the Griffin 75 Backpack has Sternum / Chest Straps (Sternum strap with a whistle buckle) while the Ruthsac Backpack does not.
|
|
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Specs | Brand | The North Face | The North Face |
| Name | Griffin 75 Backpack | Ruthsac Backpack | |
| Category | Backpacking | Commuter | |
| Sub Category | Hiking | Daypack | |
| Capacity (L) | S/M - 69L / L/XL - 74L | 31.5L | |
| Dimensions (in) | S/M - 16.1 x 11.8 x 24.8 / L/XL - 16.1 x 11.8 x 26.4 | 12 x 5.9 x 18.7 | |
| Weight (lb) | S/M - 5 lbs 8.9 oz / L/XL - 5 lbs 11.7 oz | ||
| Fabric | Body 210D IronLite™ nylon with non-PFC durable water-repellent (non-PFC DWR) finish / boot 420D IronLite™ nylon with non-PFC DWR finish | 100% recycled polyester twill or heather polyester with non-PFC durable water-repellent finish depending on colorway. | |
| Color | Asphalt Grey/Tnf Black | Brandy Brown/Root Brown | |
| Rating | 4.4 | 4.1 | |
| Price | Under $700 | Under $100 | |
| General Features | Shoulder Straps | Straight - adjustable padded strap | |
| Sternum / Chest Straps | Sternum strap with a whistle buckle | ||
| Hip Belt / Waist Strap | Molded hipbelt features two full pockets | ||
| Zippers | Wraparound J-zip | Nylon zipper with string pulls | |
| Main Compartment Access | Flap with buckle top access | Normal top two way zip access | |
| External Pockets | Front power-mesh pocket, hydration sleeve and 2 tool keepers | Two external, secure-zip barrel pockets hold water bottles and daily essentials | |
| Internal Compartments | Zippered laptop compartment | ||
| Side Pockets | 2 slip-in side pockets | 2 zippered side pockets | |
| Water Bottle | Yes | Yes | |
| Handles | Top grab handle | Top grab handle | |
| Loops and Attachments | Reflective webbing | ||
| Lightweight | Lightweight IronLite™ | ||
| Business & School Features | Laptop Sleeve | Padded | |
| Hiking / Backpacking Features | Back Panel | FlashDry™ back panel | Padded back panel |
| Hip Belt Pockets | Molded hipbelt features two full pockets | ||
| Other Features | Other Features | The patent-pending Dyno Carry System™ allows you to adjust the back panel without taking off the pack | |
You're currently comparing the Griffin 75 Backpack by The North Face against the Ruthsac Backpack by The North Face.
The North Face's Griffin 75 Backpack is a Backpacking backpack with Hiking features while The North Face's Ruthsac Backpack is a Commuter backpack with Daypack features.
The The North Face Griffin 75 Backpack has a capacity of S/M - 69L / L/XL - 74L (liters), weighs S/M - 5 lbs 8.9 oz / L/XL - 5 lbs 11.7 oz pounds and it's dimensions in inches are S/M - 16.1 x 11.8 x 24.8 / L/XL - 16.1 x 11.8 x 26.4. It's made of Body 210D IronLite™ nylon with non-PFC durable water-repellent (non-PFC DWR) finish / boot 420D IronLite™ nylon with non-PFC DWR finish and is available in Asphalt Grey/Tnf Black in comparison the The North Face Ruthsac Backpack's capacity is 31.5L with a size of 12 x 5.9 x 18.7 inches. Constructed from 100% recycled polyester twill or heather polyester with non-PFC durable water-repellent finish depending on colorway. it weighs pounds and is available in Brandy Brown/Root Brown.
Compare The North Face Griffin 75 Backpack
Click image to compare, or description to view product.
Compare The North Face Ruthsac Backpack
Click image to compare, or description to view product.
