Tommy Hilfiger Ricky II Flap Backpack vs Puma Evercat Mod Mini Backpack

The main difference between the Tommy Hilfiger Ricky II Flap Backpack and the Puma Evercat Mod Mini Backpack is that the Ricky II Flap Backpack has Internal Compartments (1 secret zip pocket) while the Evercat Mod Mini Backpack does not.

Tommy Hilfiger Ricky II Flap Backpack - Front View
Puma Evercat Mod Mini Backpack - Front View
Specs Brand Tommy Hilfiger Puma
Name Ricky II Flap Backpack Evercat Mod Mini Backpack
Category Everyday Mini
Sub Category Mini Everyday
Dimensions (in) 13.19 x 12.44 x 6.42 9 x 10 x 3
Weight (lb) 0.96 0.46
Fabric 100% Polyester blend fabric and inner lining
Color Neoprene Tommy Navy Pink
Rating 4.8
Price Under $50 Under $50
General Features Shoulder Straps Straight - adjustable strap Straight - adjustable strap
Zippers Nylon zipper Nylon zipper with metal pulls
Main Compartment Access Magnetic Flap opening Normal top zip access
External Pockets 1 Removable zip pocket cell phone pouch, 1 front zip pocket
Internal Compartments 1 secret zip pocket
Water Bottle No
Handles Top grab handle Top grab handle
Hiking / Backpacking Features Back Panel Unpadded Padded

You're currently comparing the Ricky II Flap Backpack by Tommy Hilfiger against the Evercat Mod Mini Backpack by Puma.


Tommy Hilfiger's Ricky II Flap Backpack is a Everyday backpack with Mini features while Puma's Evercat Mod Mini Backpack is a Mini backpack with Everyday features.

The Tommy Hilfiger Ricky II Flap Backpack has a capacity of (liters), weighs 0.96 pounds and it's dimensions in inches are 13.19 x 12.44 x 6.42. It's made of and is available in Neoprene Tommy Navy in comparison the Puma Evercat Mod Mini Backpack's capacity is with a size of 9 x 10 x 3 inches. Constructed from 100% Polyester blend fabric and inner lining it weighs 0.46 pounds and is available in Pink.