Baggallini Sling Backpack vs Puma Evercat Sidewall Sling Backpack
The main difference between the Baggallini Sling Backpack and the Puma Evercat Sidewall Sling Backpack is that the Sling Backpack has Side Pockets (1 side pocket) while the Evercat Sidewall Sling Backpack does not.
|
|
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Specs | Brand | Baggallini | Puma |
| Name | Sling Backpack | Evercat Sidewall Sling Backpack | |
| Category | Sling | Sling | |
| Sub Category | Everyday | Everyday | |
| Dimensions (in) | 9 x 11 x 3 | ||
| Weight (lb) | 0.68 | 0.35 | |
| Color | Blush Neoprene | Black/Silver | |
| Release Date | December 17, 2022 | ||
| Rating | 4.3 | 4.8 | |
| Price | Under $100 | Under $50 | |
| General Features | Shoulder Straps | Adjustable comfort straps | Adjustable strap |
| Zippers | Nylon zipper with metal pulls | Nylon zipper with branded pulls | |
| Main Compartment Access | Normal top zip access | Normal top zip access | |
| External Pockets | 2 zip pocket | Front zip pocket | |
| Internal Compartments | 1 zip pocket | Interior zip pocket | |
| Side Pockets | 1 side pocket | ||
| Handles | Top grab handle | ||
| Lightweight | Lightweight | ||
| Hiking / Backpacking Features | Back Panel | Padded | |
You're currently comparing the Sling Backpack by Baggallini against the Evercat Sidewall Sling Backpack by Puma.
Baggallini 's Sling Backpack is a Sling backpack with Everyday features while Puma's Evercat Sidewall Sling Backpack is a Sling backpack with Everyday features.
The Baggallini Sling Backpack has a capacity of (liters), weighs 0.68 pounds and it's dimensions in inches are 9 x 11 x 3. It's made of and is available in Blush Neoprene in comparison the Puma Evercat Sidewall Sling Backpack's capacity is with a size of inches. Constructed from it weighs 0.35 pounds and is available in Black/Silver.
Compare Baggallini Sling Backpack
Click image to compare, or description to view product.
Compare Puma Evercat Sidewall Sling Backpack
Click image to compare, or description to view product.
