Fossil Sport Backpack vs Patagonia Arbor Lid Pack 28L Backpack

The main difference between the Fossil Sport Backpack and the Patagonia Arbor Lid Pack 28L Backpack is that the Sport Backpack has Shoulder Straps (Padded adjustable shoulder straps) while the Arbor Lid Pack 28L Backpack does not.

Fossil Sport Backpack Front View
Patagonia Arbor Lid Pack 28L Backpack - Front View
Specs Brand Fossil Patagonia
Name Sport Backpack Arbor Lid Pack 28L Backpack
Category Mens Mens
Sub Category Everyday Everyday
Capacity (L) 28L
Dimensions (in) 11.5 x 4 x 16.5 19 x 10.5 x 5
Weight (lb) 1.1 1lbs 2.3oz
Fabric 100% Polyester 100% Recycled Polyester Body Fabric with PFC-Free DWR
Color 4 colors and patterns Black
Warranty Fossil 1 Year Limited Warranty
Rating 5.0
Price Under $100 Under $100
General Features Shoulder Straps Padded adjustable shoulder straps
Main Compartment Access Normal zipped access Flap with buckle and drawstring
External Pockets 1 zipped front pocket, zipped back pocket, and 2 side pockets Zippered exterior front and lid pockets
Internal Compartments Interior zipped pocket and 2 slide pockets Internal organization pocket
Side Pockets Side pockets can fit water bottle
Water Bottle Yes
Handles Top grab handle Top grab handle
Business & School Features Laptop Sleeve Padded 15" laptop
Hiking / Backpacking Features Back Panel Padded

You're currently comparing the Sport Backpack by Fossil against the Arbor Lid Pack 28L Backpack by Patagonia.


Fossil 's Sport Backpack is a Mens backpack with Everyday features while Patagonia's Arbor Lid Pack 28L Backpack is a Mens backpack with Everyday features.

The Fossil Sport Backpack has a capacity of (liters), weighs 1.1 pounds and it's dimensions in inches are 11.5 x 4 x 16.5. It's made of 100% Polyester and is available in 4 colors and patterns in comparison the Patagonia Arbor Lid Pack 28L Backpack's capacity is 28L with a size of 19 x 10.5 x 5 inches. Constructed from 100% Recycled Polyester Body Fabric with PFC-Free DWR it weighs 1lbs 2.3oz pounds and is available in Black.