Kipling City Pack S Backpack vs Baggallini Memphis Convertible Backpack

The main difference between the Kipling City Pack S Backpack and the Baggallini Memphis Convertible Backpack is that the City Pack S Backpack has Side Pockets (Side pockets can fit water bottle and accessories) while the Memphis Convertible Backpack does not.

Kipling City Pack S Backpack Front View
Baggallini Memphis Convertible Backpack - Front View
Specs Brand Kipling Baggallini
Name City Pack S Backpack Memphis Convertible Backpack
Category Womens Everyday
Sub Category Everyday Womens
Dimensions (in) 10.63 x 7.48 x 13.19 11 x 12 x 4
Weight (lb) 1.03
Fabric Polyester
Color 13 Colors and patterns Black
Warranty Kipling Limited Warranty
Rating 4.5
Price Under $75 Under $100
General Features Shoulder Straps Adjustable shoulder straps Adjustable straps
Water Proof / Water Resistant Water resistant
Zippers Nylon zipper with metal pulls
Main Compartment Access Normal zipped access and flap closure Normal top zip access
External Pockets 1 zipped front pocket and 2 side pockets 1 external pocket
Internal Compartments 1 zipped interior pocket Interior organization
Side Pockets Side pockets can fit water bottle and accessories
Water Bottle Yes
Handles Top grab handle Top grab handle
Lightweight Lightweight
Hiking / Backpacking Features Back Panel Padded
Anti Theft Features RFID Blocking RFID protection

You're currently comparing the City Pack S Backpack by Kipling against the Memphis Convertible Backpack by Baggallini .


Kipling 's City Pack S Backpack is a Womens backpack with Everyday features while Baggallini 's Memphis Convertible Backpack is a Everyday backpack with Womens features.

The Kipling City Pack S Backpack has a capacity of (liters), weighs 1.03 pounds and it's dimensions in inches are 10.63 x 7.48 x 13.19. It's made of Polyester and is available in 13 Colors and patterns in comparison the Baggallini Memphis Convertible Backpack's capacity is with a size of 11 x 12 x 4 inches. Constructed from it weighs pounds and is available in Black.