Kipling Matta Backpack vs Fossil Parker Backpack

The main difference between the Kipling Matta Backpack and the Fossil Parker Backpack is that the Matta Backpack has Side Pockets (2 slip in side pockets) while the Parker Backpack does not.

Kipling Matta Backpack - Front View
Fossil Parker Backpack - Front View
Specs Brand Kipling Fossil
Name Matta Backpack Parker Backpack
Category Mini Mini
Sub Category Womens Womens
Capacity (L) 8L
Dimensions (in) 11.25 x 11.75 x 4.75 10 x 4 x 9.25
Weight (lb) 1.07 1.38
Fabric Polyester Leather/Leather, Polyurethane Trim
Color Pine Green
Release Date March 18, 2022
Rating 4.2
Price Under $150 Under $150
General Features Shoulder Straps Adjustable, padded backpack straps 2 Adjustable & Detachable Backpack/Crossbody Straps
Zippers Nylon zipper with rubber pulls Gold metal zipper with metal pulls
Main Compartment Access Normal top two way zip access Normal top zip access
External Pockets Two side zipper pockets, front zip pocket, front flap pocket 1 Back Slide Pocket, 1 Back Zip Pocket, 1 Front Flap Pocket with Magnetic Snap
Internal Compartments Zip pocket, slip pockets 1 Slide Pocket, 1 Zip Pocket
Side Pockets 2 slip in side pockets
Water Bottle No
Handles Top grab handle Top grab handle
Hiking / Backpacking Features Back Panel Padded Unpadded

You're currently comparing the Matta Backpack by Kipling against the Parker Backpack by Fossil.


Kipling's Matta Backpack is a Mini backpack with Womens features while Fossil's Parker Backpack is a Mini backpack with Womens features.

The Kipling Matta Backpack has a capacity of 8L (liters), weighs 1.07 pounds and it's dimensions in inches are 11.25 x 11.75 x 4.75. It's made of Polyester and is available in in comparison the Fossil Parker Backpack's capacity is with a size of 10 x 4 x 9.25 inches. Constructed from Leather/Leather, Polyurethane Trim it weighs 1.38 pounds and is available in Pine Green.