Michael Kors Kent Nylon Backpack vs Adidas Originals Utility Sling Bag

The main difference between the Michael Kors Kent Nylon Backpack and the Adidas Originals Utility Sling Bag is that the Kent Nylon Backpack has Handles (Top grab handle) while the Originals Utility Sling Bag does not.

Michael Kors Kent Nylon Backpack Front View
Adidas Originals Utility Sling Bag Front View
Specs Brand Michael Kors Adidas
Name Kent Nylon Backpack Originals Utility Sling Bag
Category Mens Sling
Sub Category Everyday Mens
Dimensions (in) 13.7 x 13.3 x 7 7 x 3.5 x 13
Weight (lb) 2 0.7
Fabric Nylon 100% Polyester
Color 2 colors and patterns Black
Warranty Michael Kors 2 Years Warranty Adidas Lifetime Warranty
Release Date September 19, 2020 February 1, 2021
Rating 4.8 4.4
Price Under $250 Under $50
General Features Shoulder Straps Adjustable padded shoulder straps Adjustable shoulder strap
Main Compartment Access Normal zipped access Normal zipped access
External Pockets 1 zipped front pocket 2 front and 1 side zipped pockets
Internal Compartments 1 iPad pocket and 2 multifunction slip pockets Inner split pocket and zip mesh pocket
Side Pockets Side pocket can fit water bottle
Water Bottle Yes
Handles Top grab handle
Loops and Attachments D-rings
Convertible Yes
Lightweight Yes
Business & School Features Tablet Sleeve iPad pocket
Hiking / Backpacking Features Back Panel Mesh back panel

You're currently comparing the Kent Nylon Backpack by Michael Kors against the Originals Utility Sling Bag by Adidas .


Michael Kors 's Kent Nylon Backpack is a Mens backpack with Everyday features while Adidas 's Originals Utility Sling Bag is a Sling backpack with Mens features.

The Michael Kors Kent Nylon Backpack has a capacity of (liters), weighs 2 pounds and it's dimensions in inches are 13.7 x 13.3 x 7 . It's made of Nylon and is available in 2 colors and patterns in comparison the Adidas Originals Utility Sling Bag's capacity is with a size of 7 x 3.5 x 13 inches. Constructed from 100% Polyester it weighs 0.7 pounds and is available in Black.