Puma Barbie Backpack vs Tommy Hilfiger Kendall II Flap Backpack
The main difference between the Puma Barbie Backpack and the Tommy Hilfiger Kendall II Flap Backpack is that the Barbie Backpack has Zippers (Nylon zipper with metal ring pulls) while the Kendall II Flap Backpack does not.
|
|
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Specs | Brand | Puma | Tommy Hilfiger |
| Name | Barbie Backpack | Kendall II Flap Backpack | |
| Category | Mini | Mini | |
| Sub Category | Womens | Womens | |
| Dimensions (in) | 14.49 x 11.26 x 2.72 | ||
| Weight (lb) | 0.4 | 1.06 | |
| Fabric | 100% Polyester | Saffiano PVC construction | |
| Color | Puma Black | Tommy Navy | |
| Release Date | May 22, 2019 | ||
| Rating | 4.5 | ||
| Price | Under $50 | Under $50 | |
| General Features | Shoulder Straps | Adjustable shoulder straps | Adjustable shoulder straps. |
| Zippers | Nylon zipper with metal ring pulls | ||
| Main Compartment Access | Two-way zip closure | Fold-over flap with magnetic snap closure. | |
| External Pockets | 1 front zip pocket | ||
| Internal Compartments | 1 zip pocket | Interior zippered compartment. | |
| Handles | Top grab handle | Durable top handle. | |
| Hiking / Backpacking Features | Back Panel | Padded | |
You're currently comparing the Barbie Backpack by Puma against the Kendall II Flap Backpack by Tommy Hilfiger.
Puma's Barbie Backpack is a Mini backpack with Womens features while Tommy Hilfiger's Kendall II Flap Backpack is a Mini backpack with Womens features.
The Puma Barbie Backpack has a capacity of (liters), weighs 0.4 pounds and it's dimensions in inches are 14.49 x 11.26 x 2.72. It's made of 100% Polyester and is available in Puma Black in comparison the Tommy Hilfiger Kendall II Flap Backpack's capacity is with a size of inches. Constructed from Saffiano PVC construction it weighs 1.06 pounds and is available in Tommy Navy.
Compare Puma Barbie Backpack
Click image to compare, or description to view product.
Compare Tommy Hilfiger Kendall II Flap Backpack
Click image to compare, or description to view product.
