Puma Evercat Mod Mini Backpack vs Tommy Hilfiger Ricky II Flap Backpack

The main difference between the Puma Evercat Mod Mini Backpack and the Tommy Hilfiger Ricky II Flap Backpack is that the Evercat Mod Mini Backpack has External Pockets (1 Removable zip pocket cell phone pouch, 1 front zip pocket) while the Ricky II Flap Backpack does not.

Puma Evercat Mod Mini Backpack - Front View
Tommy Hilfiger Ricky II Flap Backpack - Front View
Specs Brand Puma Tommy Hilfiger
Name Evercat Mod Mini Backpack Ricky II Flap Backpack
Category Mini Everyday
Sub Category Everyday Mini
Dimensions (in) 9 x 10 x 3 13.19 x 12.44 x 6.42
Weight (lb) 0.46 0.96
Fabric 100% Polyester blend fabric and inner lining
Color Pink Neoprene Tommy Navy
Rating 4.8
Price Under $50 Under $50
General Features Shoulder Straps Straight - adjustable strap Straight - adjustable strap
Zippers Nylon zipper with metal pulls Nylon zipper
Main Compartment Access Normal top zip access Magnetic Flap opening
External Pockets 1 Removable zip pocket cell phone pouch, 1 front zip pocket
Internal Compartments 1 secret zip pocket
Water Bottle No
Handles Top grab handle Top grab handle
Hiking / Backpacking Features Back Panel Padded Unpadded

You're currently comparing the Evercat Mod Mini Backpack by Puma against the Ricky II Flap Backpack by Tommy Hilfiger.


Puma's Evercat Mod Mini Backpack is a Mini backpack with Everyday features while Tommy Hilfiger's Ricky II Flap Backpack is a Everyday backpack with Mini features.

The Puma Evercat Mod Mini Backpack has a capacity of (liters), weighs 0.46 pounds and it's dimensions in inches are 9 x 10 x 3. It's made of 100% Polyester blend fabric and inner lining and is available in Pink in comparison the Tommy Hilfiger Ricky II Flap Backpack's capacity is with a size of 13.19 x 12.44 x 6.42 inches. Constructed from it weighs 0.96 pounds and is available in Neoprene Tommy Navy.