Puma Lunch Kit Combo Backpack vs Puma Evercat Emulator Backpack

The main difference between the Puma Lunch Kit Combo Backpack and the Puma Evercat Emulator Backpack is that the Lunch Kit Combo Backpack has Loops and Attachments (Insulated lunch bag 10 x 8 x 2) while the Evercat Emulator Backpack does not.

Puma Lunch Kit Combo Backpack
Puma Evercat Emulator Backpack - Front View
Specs Brand Puma Puma
Name Lunch Kit Combo Backpack Evercat Emulator Backpack
Category Childrens Everyday
Sub Category School Daypack
Dimensions (in) 11 x 15 x 5 19 x 12 x 6.5
Weight (lb) 0.8
Fabric 100% Polyester 100% Polyester
Color 10+ colors and patterns Black
Warranty Puma 30 Days Warranty
Rating 4.7
Price Under $50 Under $50
General Features Shoulder Straps Adjustable webbing shoulder straps Adjustable padded shoulder straps
Zippers Nylon zipper with metal pulls
Main Compartment Access Normal zipped access Top loading back pack with two-way zip close
External Pockets 2 side pockets Front zip close pocket with organizer, 2 side mesh pockets
Internal Compartments Laptop sleeve
Side Pockets Side pockets can fit water bottle 2 side mesh pockets
Water Bottle Yes Yes
Handles Top grab handle Top grab handle
Loops and Attachments Insulated lunch bag 10 x 8 x 2
Business & School Features Laptop Sleeve Interior laptop sleeve Paded; 15" laptop
Hiking / Backpacking Features Back Panel Mesh back panel Padded

You're currently comparing the Lunch Kit Combo Backpack by Puma against the Evercat Emulator Backpack by Puma.


Puma 's Lunch Kit Combo Backpack is a Childrens backpack with School features while Puma's Evercat Emulator Backpack is a Everyday backpack with Daypack features.

The Puma Lunch Kit Combo Backpack has a capacity of (liters), weighs 0.8 pounds and it's dimensions in inches are 11 x 15 x 5 . It's made of 100% Polyester and is available in 10+ colors and patterns in comparison the Puma Evercat Emulator Backpack's capacity is with a size of 19 x 12 x 6.5 inches. Constructed from 100% Polyester it weighs pounds and is available in Black.