The North Face Griffin 75 Backpack vs Osprey Farpoint Trek 55 Backpack
The main difference between the The North Face Griffin 75 Backpack and the Osprey Farpoint Trek 55 is that the Griffin 75 Backpack has Zippers (Wraparound J-zip) while the Farpoint Trek 55 does not.
|
|
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Specs | Brand | The North Face | Osprey |
| Name | Griffin 75 Backpack | Farpoint Trek 55 | |
| Category | Backpacking | Hiking | |
| Sub Category | Hiking | Travel | |
| Capacity (L) | S/M - 69L / L/XL - 74L | 55L | |
| Dimensions (in) | S/M - 16.1 x 11.8 x 24.8 / L/XL - 16.1 x 11.8 x 26.4 | 25 x 13 x 12 | |
| Weight (lb) | S/M - 5 lbs 8.9 oz / L/XL - 5 lbs 11.7 oz | 3.9 | |
| Fabric | Body 210D IronLite™ nylon with non-PFC durable water-repellent (non-PFC DWR) finish / boot 420D IronLite™ nylon with non-PFC DWR finish | 210D Nylon Mini Hex Diamond Ripstop | |
| Color | Asphalt Grey/Tnf Black | 2 colors and patterns | |
| Warranty | Osprey Lifetime Warranty | ||
| Release Date | August 18, 2010 | ||
| Rating | 4.4 | 4.8 | |
| Price | Under $700 | Under $200 | |
| General Features | Shoulder Straps | Padded shoulder straps | |
| Sternum / Chest Straps | Sternum strap with a whistle buckle | Adjustable sternum strap with rescue whistle | |
| Hip Belt / Waist Strap | Molded hipbelt features two full pockets | Padded hip belts | |
| Zippers | Wraparound J-zip | ||
| Main Compartment Access | Flap with buckle top access | Large panel zip access | |
| External Pockets | Front power-mesh pocket, hydration sleeve and 2 tool keepers | Heat-embossed scratch-free zippered slash pocket, detachable daypack | |
| Internal Compartments | Internal front flap zippered mesh pocket | ||
| Side Pockets | 2 slip-in side pockets | Side pockets can fit water bottle | |
| Water Bottle | Yes | Yes | |
| Handles | Top grab handle | Padded top and side handles | |
| Loops and Attachments | Reflective webbing | Gear loops | |
| Lightweight | Lightweight IronLite™ | ||
| Business & School Features | Laptop Sleeve | Lockable laptop and tablet compartment | |
| Travel Features | Compression Straps | Internal and external compression straps | |
| Stowable Straps | Stowaway backpanel, harness and hipbelt with zippered rear flap | ||
| Rear Loading Straps | Yes | ||
| Hiking / Backpacking Features | Back Panel | FlashDry™ back panel | Smooth mesh covered atilon foam back panel |
| Load Lifters | Yes | ||
| Internal / External Frame | Internal 3.5mm lightWire peripheral frame | ||
| Hip Belt Pockets | Molded hipbelt features two full pockets | ||
| Anti Theft Features | Lockable Zippers | Lockable sliders on main compartment zipper | |
| Other Features | Other Features | The patent-pending Dyno Carry System™ allows you to adjust the back panel without taking off the pack | |
You're currently comparing the Griffin 75 Backpack by The North Face against the Farpoint Trek 55 by Osprey .
The North Face's Griffin 75 Backpack is a Backpacking backpack with Hiking features while Osprey 's Farpoint Trek 55 is a Hiking backpack with Travel features.
The The North Face Griffin 75 Backpack has a capacity of S/M - 69L / L/XL - 74L (liters), weighs S/M - 5 lbs 8.9 oz / L/XL - 5 lbs 11.7 oz pounds and it's dimensions in inches are S/M - 16.1 x 11.8 x 24.8 / L/XL - 16.1 x 11.8 x 26.4. It's made of Body 210D IronLite™ nylon with non-PFC durable water-repellent (non-PFC DWR) finish / boot 420D IronLite™ nylon with non-PFC DWR finish and is available in Asphalt Grey/Tnf Black in comparison the Osprey Farpoint Trek 55 's capacity is 55L with a size of 25 x 13 x 12 inches. Constructed from 210D Nylon Mini Hex Diamond Ripstop it weighs 3.9 pounds and is available in 2 colors and patterns.
Compare The North Face Griffin 75 Backpack
Click image to compare, or description to view product.
Compare Osprey Farpoint Trek 55 Backpack
Click image to compare, or description to view product.
