Patagonia Arbor Lid Pack 28L Backpack vs Oakley Men's Packable Backpack

The main difference between the Patagonia Arbor Lid Pack 28L Backpack and the Oakley Men's Packable Backpack is that the Arbor Lid Pack 28L Backpack has Internal Compartments (Internal organization pocket) while the Men's Packable Backpack does not.

Patagonia Arbor Lid Pack 28L Backpack - Front View
Oakley Men's Packable Backpack Front Vieww
Specs Brand Patagonia Oakley
Name Arbor Lid Pack 28L Backpack Men's Packable Backpack
Category Mens Mens
Sub Category Everyday Everyday
Capacity (L) 28L 18L
Dimensions (in) 19 x 10.5 x 5 16.5 x 13 x 1.5
Weight (lb) 1lbs 2.3oz 0.6
Fabric 100% Recycled Polyester Body Fabric with PFC-Free DWR 100% Nylon
Color Black 2 colors and patterns
Warranty Oakley 1 Year Warranty
Rating 4.6
Price Under $100 Under $50
General Features Shoulder Straps Air mesh adjustable shoulder straps
Main Compartment Access Flap with buckle and drawstring Normal zipped access
External Pockets Zippered exterior front and lid pockets 1 zipped front pocket
Internal Compartments Internal organization pocket
Handles Top grab handle Top grab handle
Lightweight Yes
Business & School Features Laptop Sleeve Padded 15" laptop
Travel Features Packable / Foldable Packs into its integral pocket
Hiking / Backpacking Features Back Panel Padded

You're currently comparing the Arbor Lid Pack 28L Backpack by Patagonia against the Men's Packable Backpack by Oakley.


Patagonia's Arbor Lid Pack 28L Backpack is a Mens backpack with Everyday features while Oakley's Men's Packable Backpack is a Mens backpack with Everyday features.

The Patagonia Arbor Lid Pack 28L Backpack has a capacity of 28L (liters), weighs 1lbs 2.3oz pounds and it's dimensions in inches are 19 x 10.5 x 5. It's made of 100% Recycled Polyester Body Fabric with PFC-Free DWR and is available in Black in comparison the Oakley Men's Packable Backpack's capacity is 18L with a size of 16.5 x 13 x 1.5 inches. Constructed from 100% Nylon it weighs 0.6 pounds and is available in 2 colors and patterns.